The HSUS has worked for more than a half century to develop effective strategies for shelters to drive down euthanasia of healthy and treatable dogs and cats. One primary strategy has been to promote spaying and neutering, and the other, to promote adoption. A corollary strategy, which is becoming an increasingly important focus for the most effective shelters and rescue groups, has been to provide resources or advice to assure that pets stay in the home once they are there, since relinquishment has become the number one source of animals coming in to shelters.

In New York, we’re implementing innovative approaches strategies through our Pet Help Partners program to keep animals in the home and to work through problems that pet owners are having. Our helpline fields thousands of calls each year from families struggling to resolve conflicts that threaten to separate them from their pets – whether it’s due to a life crisis such as job loss, a family member who has developed an allergy to their pet, a pet behavior problem they don’t know how to resolve, or sometimes a conflict with a landlord.

iStockphoto

New York City is the highest rent and apartment-living market in the U.S., and helpline calls from people experiencing housing-related conflicts are common. Often, these family and pet relationships are saved simply by talking through options with one of our helpline counselors who can provide information about their tenant rights under the law. In some of the more extreme cases, PHP seeks assistance from The HSUS’ Animal Protection Litigation department, whose members work to develop and implement legal strategies for helping animals.

Here is how our work helped two pet-loving citizens, Rubin and Carmen, in their efforts to keep their animals:

When a PHP staff member met Rubin, he was sitting in the lobby of Animal Care & Control of NYC with his elderly dog, Red, lying at his feet. Rubin, a senior citizen who suffers from emotional and psychological disabilities and relies heavily on his dog for emotional support, was there to relinquish his closest companion of 11 years because of a new NYC public housing policy prohibiting certain breeds. Rubin was devastated at the thought of losing his pet, but he had no money for a new apartment, nor could he consider living somewhere other than the home he had lived in for decades. It seemed that there was no recourse – a city officer had ordered him to remove his friendly dog from the apartment. Fortunately for Rubin and his best friend, the PHP staff member happened to be in the shelter lobby that day and offered him assistance.

Similarly, Carmen and her family was in danger of losing their two beloved dogs because her landlord claimed that keeping the dogs in their Brooklyn apartment was a violation of her lease, even though Carmen's family had openly maintained the dogs for a long time. The landlord notified Carmen that she must remove her dogs or be subject to eviction proceedings. Carmen lives with and cares for her father and her mother who both suffer from serious emotional disabilities and take great comfort in the presence of their pets.

It was our legal team’s long-standing relationship with Paul Ferrillo at Weil, Gotshal, and Manges that made it possible for Carmen and Rubin to keep their animal companions. When The HSUS presented Weil with these cases, Paul and his team went to work, arguing in various courthouses in New York City, among other things, that various provisions of state and federal law required property owners to make reasonable accommodations for tenants to allow them to keep their pets as support animals. 

There’s no formula for keeping pets in the home – every circumstance and case is different. But we are learning a hundred different ways to help, and then passing the lessons on to other shelters. In the end, we are helping to maintain the human-animal bond, to avoid the heartache that comes from separation and relinquishment, and, in the broadest sense, to save lives and prevent euthanasia of healthy and treatable dogs and cats in our communities.

Those of us who have shared our homes with a rescued pet know their loyalty runs deep. But deep enough to save someone’s life? Absolutely. This year's Pets of Valor Award highlights just that – the lifesaving heroics of five former castaways who risked life and limb to rescue their human companions.

Of our top five Pets of Valor finalists, a few of them were found wandering the streets. Another came out of a drug house. One had been shot, and still had lead shot in his hip when he was dumped at the shelter.

Each of them got a second chance. And then when there was a moment of crisis for their rescuer, they responded with bravery and heroism – becoming the rescuers themselves.

Omar Von Muller
Uggie, star of the Academy Award-winning film "The Artist,"
is the official spokesdog for Pets of Valor.

You may remember the scene from the Academy Award-winning film “The Artist,” where Uggie, a Jack Russell Terrier, saves the life of his owner from a fire. Taz, one of the Pets of Valor Award finalists, also completed this life-saving feat, but there was no director, no stage, and certainly no chance for a second “take.”

It’s this sort of heroism that makes the finalists for the Pets of Valor Award so remarkable. Whether it’s a fire, a life-threatening medical emergency, or an attack by a sexual offender, these rescued and adopted pets acted valiantly to protect the humans they’d come to love. The human-animal bond doesn’t get any stronger than this.

For those of us who’ve known animals, it’s impossible to doubt that they have feelings and emotions. Now, with the Pets of Valor program, we know that they exhibit intentional, altruistic behavior – the sort of behavior that, if one of us did it, would result in our getting the key to the city and our name in the paper.

I encourage you to take a few minutes to read the heroic stories, then vote and tell us who your favorite dog or cat is. You can vote once a day until this Friday, May 31, at 5 pm EDT. Not only will you help one of these animals win, but you’ll help the shelter or rescue group who cared for the animal win free dog food for a year (500 pounds), courtesy of the award’s sponsor, BOGO Bowl.

P.S. Thinking of adding a pet to your family? Check out the wonderful companion animals available for adoption at a shelter or rescue near you and adopt your own Pet of Valor.

Puppy mills, by definition, come up short on animal welfare, taking moral and practical shortcuts in order to churn out dogs for the pet trade – by confining animals indefinitely, breeding them every heat cycle, and denying them proper veterinary care. But the conditions our rescue team witnessed at a raid in Mississippi on Monday were nothing short of appalling. It was, in a word, a nightmare for the animals.

Chuck Cook/The HSUS

When our staff arrived on the scene with the Walthall County Sheriff’s Office, they found live dogs sharing cages with the bodies of dead ones. Surviving dogs suffered from terrible injuries, including one dog with a severed leg. Blankets of feces covered the bottoms of the cages, and scattered throughout the property were the skeletal remains of many dogs for whom help arrived too late.

We were able to pull 104 dogs out of that hellhole. They have been safely transported to the Humane Society of South Mississippi where they are being treated by a team of veterinarians and other animal care professionals. Those nursed back to health will be screened for adoption so they can enjoy new, better lives.

Over the past five years, we’ve partnered with law enforcement to help close down dozens of mills. Nearly all of them were selling puppies online. This sales strategy requires no federal license, and in Mississippi and other states with no rules governing mills, commercial breeders who sell puppies online are subject to no oversight whatsoever.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture only inspects dog breeders that sell to pet stores, but it is currently in the process of making final a rule change that would require large-scale breeding facilities that sell puppies online to be federally licensed and inspected as well. If the USDA could inspect all large-scale commercial breeders, regardless of their means of commerce, it would be in a position to prevent a house of horrors like the one we witnessed in Mississippi.

Additionally, Sens. Dick Durbin, D-Ill. and David Vitter, R-La., along with Reps. Jim Gerlach, R-Pa., Sam Farr, D-Calif., Bill Young, R-Fla., and Lois Capps, D-Calif., reintroduced the Puppy Uniform Protection and Safety Act, S. 395/ H.R. 847, which would require direct sellers of 50 or more puppies to be federally licensed and inspected for basic humane standards of care. The PUPS Act would also require that licensed facilities let dogs out of their cages for at least an hour a day.

This Mississippi case reminds us of what’s at stake, and why it’s so critical that we adopt this policy.

Watch the video:

India is known throughout the world as a nation of vegetarians, and vegetarianism is indeed very common there. In recent years, however, this growing economic power, even with its strong, animal-friendly religious and cultural traditions, has seen meat eating on the rise, and the worst elements of factory farming are taking hold. There are an estimated 140 to 200 million egg-laying hens living in conventional battery cages in the world’s largest democracy.

When I went to India last November to launch our new offices on the subcontinent, I visited nearly a half dozen battery cage facilities. I saw hens living in space allotments smaller than a sheet of printer paper. I saw filth and flies and overcrowding. And I saw animals who would never make it out of their cages alive.

Erin Van Voorhies

Such confinement violates the provisions of Section 11(1)(e) of the 1960 national Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, which requires that animals confined to cages be provided with reasonable opportunity for movement. Guided by the plain language of this foresighted statute, the Animal Welfare Board of India issued an advisory a year ago to all state governments stating that battery cages should not be used, and that existing battery cages should be phased out by 2017.

Humane Society International India has been following up with all of the state animal husbandry departments in the country, convincing them to issue a directive that it is a violation of the PCA Act to confine hens in battery cages. Accordingly, a majority of them have issued directives to their officers, and poultry farmers have been instructed to phase out and avoid battery cages, and not to make any investments in these extreme confinement facilities.

In India, there is a big gap between what the law says and what happens on the ground, and that’s especially true when it comes to animals. But in this case, the law is unambiguous, and we know that there are other ways to raise birds. This correction may take a while, but the trajectory is clear. Our staff members in India are determined to see this through. No nation that values animals, as India does, can indefinitely confine more than 100 million birds in these kinds of conditions. 

Speak Up For Hens! Tell India’s Government to Enforce the Ruling >>

The HSUS is known as an anti-cruelty organization, and many assume that our primary concern is domesticated species. But we also work hard to protect wild animals from a variety of threats, and our work on that front is wide-ranging. 

Alamy

This year marks the 40th anniversary of the Endangered Species Act – one of a raft of visionary animal protection and conservation laws passed in the late 1960s and early 1970s that collectively signified a new approach and commitment to nature and to wild animals. Today we celebrate Endangered Species Day, a reminder that we humans have all the power in our relationship with wildlife and that we must take intentional actions to protect species from a variety of human-caused threats. The ecologist Aldo Leopold explained that the first rule of intelligent tinkering is to save all the parts.

Here are some of the ways that we fight for rare species:

• The HSUS’ Wildlife Land Trust protects thousands of acres of habitat for endangered and imperiled wildlife. We now protect lands in 38 states for both abundant and endangered wildlife. Ultimately, preservation of habitat is the foundation of all efforts aimed at saving wildlife.
• In the last decade, lawsuits filed by The HSUS have successfully prevented efforts to eliminate Endangered Species Act protections for gray wolves on seven different occasions. But recently the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service removed wolves in the Northern Rockies and Great Lakes from the list of federally protected species, allowing states to assume control over management. State fish and wildlife agencies, pushed by the hunting and ranching lobbies, almost immediately decided to open up hunting and trapping seasons, with Montana now seeking to have a wolf season that lasts for more than half the year. We are back in court again fighting to restore federal protections for wolves. In the broadest sense, we are fighting for the protection of predators, since these apex species play such critical roles in balancing ecosystems.
• We petitioned the Department of Interior to list the African lion under the Endangered Species Act, saving lions from American trophy hunters who kill the cats and bring them home for bragging rights.
• Earlier this year, we successfully defended the Endangered Species Act listing of polar bears in court, and are working to prevent Congress from weakening the Endangered Species Act by allowing trophy hunters to import parts of threatened polar bears. More broadly, we are working with the United States and Russia to promote policies to end the international trade of polar bear hides and parts.
• Not long ago, there were only a few dozen surviving California condors. Today there are a few hundred, and still dangerously scarce. One of the major threats to the condor is lead poisoning from ammunition left behind by hunters. We are sponsoring California AB 711 to require non-lead ammunition for hunting, and that bill passed the California Assembly just yesterday. We are also working to ban other deadly toxins, including the use of Compound 1080, used by the USDA in its predator control programs.
• We are lobbying the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to block imports of five species of large constricting snakes. These species have been identified as an invasive species risk. Already, in the Everglades, Burmese pythons have wiped out large numbers of mammals and they threaten the prey base for the highly endangered Florida panther. The pythons are a direct threat to other endangered species as well.
• We work across the country to give full ESA protections to captive animals where their wild counterparts are listed. Just this year we helped pass a ban on the keeping of chimpanzees and other primates as pets in Arkansas, and work to end the private possession of tigers, chimpanzees, wolves, and other dangerous wild animals. We also work to end the killing of endangered antelope who are shot for trophies at captive hunting facilities right here in the U.S.
• Only a few hundred right whales swim off of our coasts, and The HSUS leads the fight to stop ship strikes, fatal entanglement and protect habitat for these sea monarchs.
• Our unparalleled anti-poaching campaign provides several hundred thousand dollars in rewards for tips on poaching cases, including for ESA-listed Mexican gray wolves, whooping cranes, Canada lynx and Steller sea lions, and allows us to partner with federal law enforcement on wildlife trafficking investigations.

Last night, during a marathon round of voting on amendments to its version of the Farm Bill, the House Agriculture Committee approved a destructive and constitutionally questionable amendment, offered by Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, that threatens to wipe out important state laws banning the cruelest factory farming practices, and leave a raft of other state laws and rules regulating agriculture hanging in the balance.

The committee, over the objections of its leadership, did approve an amendment led by Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., by a vote of 28-17, building on the existing federal law against animal fighting by making it a crime to knowingly attend or bring a child to an animal fight (the vote tally is pasted below). The Senate Committee on Agriculture, which took up its version of the Farm Bill on Tuesday, included a similar provision in its bill, thanks to the efforts of committee Chairwoman Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., and ranking member Thad Cochran, R-Miss. With both versions of the Farm Bill including the same core provisions on animal fighting, it should be included in any final bill approved by the Congress.

Agriculture Committee chairman Frank Lucas, R-Okla., and former chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Virginia, spoke out against the animal fighting bill. Goodlatte said he felt the McGovern amendment provides too severe a penalty for perpetrators, and argued that parents who brought a child to a dogfight would be separated from their children and that was something he couldn’t support. Rep. Kurt Schrader, D-Oregon, one of the two veterinarians in the House, said he worried much more about not interceding when a parent brings a child to an animal fighting spectacle, with the violence and other forms of criminality all right out in the open. Ironically, Goodlatte touted his support for a prior upgrade of the federal animal fighting law in 2007, making interstate transport of animals for fighting a federal felony. Someone arrested for that crime has as much a chance of being separated from a child as an individual arrested for a bringing a child directly to a fight. The argument made little sense, and appeared to be just another attempt to stand in the way of any progress for animal welfare.

Goodlatte also joined Rep. King’s gambit to wipe out numerous state animal protection laws, including those regarding factory farm confinement, horse slaughter and shark finning, along with others related to food safety, environmental protection, worker safety and more. King’s measure passed by a voice vote after a contentious debate. There were forceful arguments raised against it by Reps. Jim Costa, D-Calif., Jeff Denham, R-Calif., John Garamendi, D-Calif., and Schrader.  

If passed by the full House, King’s amendment could allow the overturning of every voter-approved animal welfare ballot measure relating to agriculture, including Proposition 2 in California (banning extreme confinement crates for pigs, veal calves and laying hens), Proposition 6 in California (forbidding the sale of horses for slaughter for human consumption), Proposition 204 in Arizona (banning veal and pig gestation crates) and Amendment 10 in Florida (outlawing pig gestation crates). The amendment could also nullify six other state bans on gestation crates, horse slaughter bans in six states, comprehensive animal welfare standards adopted by the Ohio Livestock Care Standards Board, and a raft of anti-downer laws and other animal protection laws designed to shield farm animals from abuse and extreme confinement.

The Senate version of the Farm Bill does not contain any language similar to the King amendment. The  HSUS and other groups will work to strip the King amendment from the House Farm Bill on the floor, and also push for adoption of the landmark agreement between animal welfare groups and the egg industry in phasing out the use of conventional battery cages, and creating minimum care standards for the welfare of laying hens. The battle over the Farm Bill is just now gearing up and now all members of Congress, and their constituents, can have input on the process.

Animal Fighting Amendment Votes:

View our interactive 2012 Annual Report.

Today we’re officially releasing The HSUS’ 2012 Annual Report, which pulls together the many strands of work of the world’s largest animal protection organization and bundles them together in a single place. We’re committed to transparency in the communication of our results and the management of our affairs. As you’ll see by reading this report, there really is no organization like The HSUS in the world – with program departments focused on companion animals, farm animals, equine, wildlife and marine mammals, and animal research and testing issues. In addition, via Humane Society International, there is a far-reaching enterprise extending the impact of our programs throughout the world. Our staff consists of veterinarians, wildlife biologists, issue experts, educators, investigators, lawyers, lobbyists, animal care specialists, and so many others, united in their passion for halting human-caused cruelty and providing care and protection to all animals.

In 2012, The HSUS and its affiliates provided direct care for more than 100,000 animals – making us the largest provider of direct services to animals in the country. We care for animals through the work of our Animal Rescue Team, our traveling veterinary teams, our Animal Care Centers, our Pets for Life programs, our Humane Wildlife Services team, and our Wildlife Innovations and Response Team. As with our advocacy work, it’s the most diverse set of animal care programs you’ll find anywhere. We run six animal care centers, and we also run dozens of companion animal shelters, principally temporary shelters we set up after we raid the sites of large-scale animal cruelty or neglect.

But if we only conducted rescue, we’d be failing in our mission. Our greatest purpose is to prevent cruelty by challenging legal, institutionalized forms of animal abuse. It’s this work that leads us into the domains of factory farming, the fur trade, wildlife cruelties, puppy mills, the exotic animal trade, horse slaughter and soring, and so many other areas. In 2012, we made historic progress in our campaign to eliminate the use of gestation crates on factory farms, in getting chimpanzees out of laboratories and into sanctuaries, and in exposing horse “soring” abuses that shocked the nation.

I hope you’ll carefully peruse this report in order to understand the breadth of our work and, we hope, to be a strong ambassador for the organization. The Annual Report also provides a roadmap for where we are taking society on the fundamental question of our relationship with the other animals who share our world. Thank you.

Tennessee Gov. Bill Haslam’s veto of a proposed “ag-gag” bill yesterday almost overshadowed progress toward a milestone in our anti-gestation crate campaign: the New Jersey legislature gave final approval to Senate Bill 1921 to bring the Garden State that much closer to being the 10th state to ban the extreme confinement of breeding sows. Championed by state Sen. Raymond Lesniak, D-Union, the bill enjoys broad partisan support – having passed the Senate 29 to 4 and the Assembly 60 to 5. Now it awaits Gov. Chris Christie’s signature.

The HSUS

This legislative progress comes just two weeks after Canada’s top eight supermarkets agreed to phase out their purchases of pork from operations that confine sows in this extreme way. That’s in addition to the 50-plus companies in the U.S. that have made similar pledges – from McDonald’s to Costco to Cracker Barrel.

There’s a lot of talk by some within the pork industry that these confinement crates are humane. But how can a housing system be humane if the animals are immobilized for almost their entire lives? Isn’t it a priori inhumane to deny an animal the opportunity to engage in the most basic behaviors, including the opportunity to turn around?

As the states and so many North American corporations work to give pigs more space and better lives, there are some in Congress who are trying to subvert this elemental progress. Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, one of the most anti-animal welfare politicians in modern history, is planning to offer an amendment tomorrow during votes in the House Agriculture Committee to nullify all state and local laws to protect farm animals (the measure is so radical it would also nullify state rules and laws related to worker safety, environmental protection, and food safety).

I have to laugh when politicians like King throw out their bromides, in their windy discourses on other issues on the House floor, about “protecting states’ rights.” The fact is, when they don’t like what the states do, they are quick to become advocates of federal supremacy. That’s not a case of principle, but of ideological opportunism and deception. Let’s hope that if members of the House Agriculture Committee do not place sufficient importance on animal welfare, at least they’ll pay attention to federalism and the other principles of our American Constitution.

NEWS ALERT: This morning, Governor Bill Haslam of Tennessee vetoed the legislature’s proposed ag-gag bill, squelching the only state anti-whistleblower measure that made it to a governor’s desk this year. See our full statement on this major outcome for our cause – preserving our right to conduct investigations and to document animal cruelty.

Now comes another sweeping, menacing attack against our movement – this time in Congress. An Iowa congressman wants to force a vote to repeal the rights of citizens to regulate how their food is produced. The traditional responsibilities of state legislators to establish laws governing food safety, animal husbandry and worker protections would be eliminated, wiped from the books – in both existing law and any future law. County and local ordinances? Eliminated.

Shocked? I am.

iStockphoto

This is the work of Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa. Typically, conservative Republicans like King vigorously defend states’ rights. But not, it seems, when they can serve special interests. In this instance, conservative values are tossed to the wind so that King and his allies can strong-arm the states aside. Yes, this is an almost unheard-of power grab, but it’s not a matter of King wanting the federal government to establish strong, uniform standards for agriculture. In fact, he’s dead-set against that too, as evidenced by his opposition to pending legislation establishing space requirements for laying hens and labeling standards for eggs (the Egg Products Inspection Act Amendments of 2013 - S. 820/H.R. 1731). No, in King’s world, weak or nonexistent standards would take the place of states’ rights – consumers and animals be damned.

You may have heard of the King amendment last year – when he advanced it as part of the 2012 Farm Bill. Well, the Farm Bill was sidetracked by election-year politics. But this year, Congress is likely to act and complete work on the bill. That means the King amendment is no longer a debating point, or a simple sop to the big ag lobby. It’s a threat to every consumer and to every animal in agriculture. The House Agriculture Committee is scheduled to vote on it Wednesday. This same committee voted in favor of a virtually identical King amendment last time around.

King’s goal is to overturn every voter-approved animal welfare ballot measure relating to agriculture – Prop 2 in California (banning extreme confinement crates for pigs, veal calves, and laying hens), Prop 6 in California (forbidding the sale of horses for slaughter for human consumption), Prop 204 in Arizona (banning veal and gestation crates), and Amendment 10 in Florida (outlawing gestation crates). The amendment could also nullify six other state bans on gestation crates, horse slaughter bans in a half-dozen other states, the comprehensive animal welfare standards adopted by the Ohio Livestock Care Standards Board, and a raft of anti-downer laws and other animal protection laws designed to shield farm animals from abuse and extreme confinement.

But the reach of his amendment goes further. It seeks to nullify every state, county, or local law that creates any standard or condition relating to an agricultural production activity – so we’d have no state laws for agricultural facilities relating to worker rights, animal welfare, environmental protection, or public health. It’s hard to overstate how sweeping and far-reaching the King amendment is.

King thinks it’s fine to spend taxpayer money doling out billions to corporate farmers in the way of direct payments, crop insurance, predator control programs, and other subsidies. He’s built a reputation on it. But he doesn’t want the agriculture community to have to abide by any rules related to food safety, animal welfare, or environmental protection. In his mind, the federal government is a bank for the farm lobby, and not a protector of society’s broader interests in a safe, humane, and sustainable food supply.

He’s also spent his 10-year congressional career attempting to block any and all animal welfare laws. He favors killing horses for human consumption, killing American bison in Yellowstone National Park, and trophy killing of polar bears, even though they are an endangered species. He is the best friend that dogfighters and cockfighters have in Congress, trying to stop any law-and-order bill to make life tougher on these criminals. And get this: he was even one of a handful of lawmakers to oppose legislation that seeks to include pets in disaster planning.

We need level-headed members of Congress to stop this craziness now, before it becomes part of the billions of dollars in horse trading that any new Farm Bill produces. Contact your representative today and tell them to overthrow the King amendment.

As we await final action from Tennessee Gov. Bill Haslam on the fate of the state’s awful and overreaching ag-gag bill (which the state’s attorney general yesterday called “constitutionally suspect” in a formal written opinion), Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder late this week took an extraordinarily hostile action on another bill we have a great interest in. He signed a bill pushed by state Sen. Tom Casperson that not only seeks to undercut the petition drive we and our partners launched to block wolf hunting, but also gives unilateral authority to the seven-member Natural Resources Commission to remove just about any species in Michigan from the protected list and open a trophy hunting or trapping season on them.

iStockphoto

In a coordinated one-two punch against wolves and other wildlife in the state, the NRC approved a fall wolf hunting season just hours after Snyder signed the bill into law. Trophy hunters and trappers will be allowed to kill about 43 wolves in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula, and that figure certainly would have been higher but for our intense scrutiny of the plan to kill members of this keystone species. There are only about 650 wolves in the entire state, and they were just removed from the federal list of species threatened with extinction, after decades of protection.

Our original wolf protection referendum – which we submitted at the end of March with more than 253,000 signatures – should be certified for the ballot, and it will indeed appear on the November 2014 ballot. We believe that if voters decide to favor our position on the ballot measure to reject the original wolf hunting law that the legislature passed, that the NRC should honor the wishes of the people and terminate a hunt. 

But it’s impossible to know how the NRC will react to our winning the 2014 ballot fight. The question now is, do we mount a second referendum campaign to nullify the law that Snyder signed and quash their attempt to kill perhaps thousands of wolves over the next decade and turn back their larger, more dangerous plan to consolidate all authority over hunting programs in the hands of a few bureaucrats appointed by the governor?

I am outraged about the governor’s action, and the actions of an arrogant legislature, which thumbed its nose at the people, and has tried to subvert a constitutionally guaranteed right to decide issues directly. But I’d like your opinions. Write me and let me know if you think we should mount a second effort to protect the wolves and to protect the right of the citizens to more directly control decisions related to wildlife protection.